Hypothesis Underpinning Dementia Research ‘Flawed’
October 19, 2018
Manchester, UK – A hypothesis which has been the standard way of explaining how the body develops Alzheimer’s disease for almost 30 years is flawed, according to a University of Manchester biologist.
The ‘Amyloid Cascade’ argues that a series of stages, starting from the deposition of a starch-like protein called amyloid and ending with dementia, should be reassessed.
Prof. Andrew Doig’s review of 120 scientific papers finds that the stages were not linked together in a cascade and the progression to dementia was not linear. His review is published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease.
“It’s wrong to use a series of waterfalls as an analogy for how dementia develops, as water cannot flow uphill”, said Prof. Doig.
“My review shows the system is actually cyclical and does not flow one way – but is a series of feedback loops. Progress in recent years shows some of the elements go back and forth – both upstream and downstream. Most research has been at the top of the cascade. But we need to consider other drug targets too.”
According to the cascade, enzymes cut the amyloid into fragments which form plaques that damage cells. Calcium rises in cells, followed by inflammation and then oxidative stress – an imbalance between certain molecules containing oxygen and antioxidants – and then cell death which causes dementia.
However, according to the research reviewed by Prof. Doig, inflammation can either lead to enhanced amyloid deposition or oxidative stress.
Prof. Doig added: “The fact that this process is cyclical has important implications as we’re missing opportunities for drug discovery. So for example, we need to take a closer look at inflammation and oxidative stress and their relation to amyloid plaques. If we use the Amyloid Cascade hypothesis, that would be less likely to happen.
“Over the 26 years since the cascade was first described, hundreds of drugs based on this hypothesis have been trialled in people but none of them have worked. But if you realise the cyclical nature of this, then combinations of therapies could have a part to play.”
NOTES FOR EDITORS
Full study: AJ Doig (2018) “Positive Feedback Loops in Alzheimer’s Disease – The Alzheimer’s Feedback Hypothesis” J Alzheimer Dis 66 (1) (doi: 10.3233/JAD-180583).
The author Prof. Andrew Doig is available for comment (+44 161 3064224; firstname.lastname@example.org).
For media enquiries contact Mike Addelman, Media Relations Officer, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester (+44 161 275 2111; email@example.com)
About the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Celebrating its 20th anniversary in 2018, the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer’s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. Groundbreaking research that has appeared in the journal includes novel therapeutic targets, mechanisms of disease and clinical trial outcomes. JAD has an Impact Factor of 3.476 according to the 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018). j-alz.com